On many sites many people in the US seem to mention a 20-20-20 or 10-10-10 etc, yet generally it is not freely available in Australia, and reading papers on it, this type of fertilizer is never mentioned, the 1-1.2-0.6 or similar is. This is a paper just on Nitrogen rates that could help.What I found most interesting is that a 20-5-20 fertilizer is most common in fig tree nutrition.
If I’m reading the study correctly, fertilizer with 1-1.2-0.6 produced the highest yields, but also showed a deficiency in nitrogen. The only treatment in the study that applied more nitrogen than phosphorus and potassium was 0.3-0-0. I wonder if nitrogen was applied at a higher rate, they would see the same or higher yields, but without the noted nitrogen deficiency.
On many sites many people in the US seem to mention a 20-20-20 or 10-10-10 etc, yet generally it is not freely available in Australia, and reading papers on it, this type of fertilizer is never mentioned, the 1-1.2-0.6 or similar is. This is a paper just on Nitrogen rates that could help.
This surprised me.On many sites many people in the US seem to mention a 20-20-20 or 10-10-10 etc, yet generally it is not freely available in Australia, and reading papers on it, this type of fertilizer is never mentioned, the 1-1.2-0.6 or similar is. This is a paper just on Nitrogen rates that could help.
Sorry, I don't believe that I have seen any yet.Are you aware of any studies that hold nitrogen as a constant and apply varying amounts of phosphorus?