How much water for an inground fig?

S

shevitz

Well-known member
I’m moving this discussion to a new thread. I have a 6’ wide x 5’ tall tree in ground. I live in the desert with no rain, sandy soil, temps around 90 atm, and rock mulch over landscaping fabric. I’d like to hear opinions on how much water this tree needs a week. I’ve been giving it something like 10 gallons and the brebas are dropping although the tree looks healthy.

There are lots of AI answers, and possibly even a fig calculator online, but I have searched the archives and really haven’t found anything in this forum so I thought I would come to the experts.

Doing the math, a 6’ circle with 1.5” per week comes out to something like 17.5 gallons.

Also what circle would you water within?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0718.jpeg
    IMG_0718.jpeg
    709.7 KB · Views: 6
Growing in the desert I would think black landscape fabric and rocks would hold a lot of heat . I would use a 4 to 6 inch layer of wood chips, around 3 to 4 ft circle around the tree.
 
shevitz said:
Also what circle would you water within?
Click to expand...
At least 6 foot diameter, with perimeter to contain a thick layer of wood chips as recommended by Pete. The evaporation rate is high in your location, so the water should be delivered quickly to sink in -- not by soaker hose. I use four Orbit 1/4 pattern Stream Bubbler heads per tree basin, mounted just inside the perimeter. They are programmed to come on twice per week for 8 minutes. The quantity of water delivered is intended to match our local evapotranspiration rate.

b573398f-8d24-4f90-a817-59925efdbd68-1_all_19323.jpg
 
What time of day are you watering? I am definitely not an expert but in our area we have to water very early in am or late evening to avoid the rapid evaporation or steam killing the plants.
 
Charlie Dodgson said:
At least 6 foot diameter, with perimeter to contain a thick layer of wood chips as recommended by Pete. The evaporation rate is high in your location, so the water should be delivered quickly to sink in -- not by soaker hose. I use four Orbit 1/4 pattern Stream Bubbler heads per tree basin, mounted just inside the perimeter. They are programmed to come on twice per week for 8 minutes. The quantity of water delivered is intended to match our local evapotranspiration rate.

View attachment 23803
Click to expand...
would drip emitters below the mulch help with that?
 
Motherwise said:
What time of day are you watering? I am definitely not an expert but in our area we have to water very early in am or late evening to avoid the rapid evaporation or steam killing the plants.
Click to expand...
I've heard, but don't know whether it's true, that if you
Charlie Dodgson said:
At least 6 foot diameter, with perimeter to contain a thick layer of wood chips as recommended by Pete. The evaporation rate is high in your location, so the water should be delivered quickly to sink in -- not by soaker hose. I use four Orbit 1/4 pattern Stream Bubbler heads per tree basin, mounted just inside the perimeter. They are programmed to come on twice per week for 8 minutes. The quantity of water delivered is intended to match our local evapotranspiration rate.

View attachment 23803
Click to expand...
Hey @Charlie Dodgson would it help at all to bury a soaker hose in those conditions?
 
paupau said:
would drip emitters below the mulch help with that?
Click to expand...
cdh said:
would it help at all to bury a soaker hose in those conditions?
Click to expand...
No. If the mulch is not getting wet then both it and the soil surface are at the air temperature. As a result, you have a slow trickle of water competing with a fast evaporation rate. In addition, drip only wets small spots on the surface and in shevitz's soil there will be little lateral dispersion as it sinks. Overall, under those conditions it is better to quickly flood the basin.
Motherwise said:
we have to water very early in am
Click to expand...
An excellent choice. This will help but flooding is still needed.
 
Charlie Dodgson said:
No. If the mulch is not getting wet then both it and the soil surface are at the air temperature. As a result, you have a slow trickle of water competing with a fast evaporation rate. In addition, drip only wets small spots on the surface and in shevitz's soil there will be little lateral dispersion as it sinks. Overall, under those conditions it is better to quickly flood the basin.

An excellent choice. This will help but flooding is still needed.
Click to expand...
Interesting... i think you may be the first person i've ever heard say that burying drip tape under mulch would not help keep the water from evaporating.
 
Charlie Dodgson said:
At least 6 foot diameter, with perimeter to contain a thick layer of wood chips as recommended by Pete. The evaporation rate is high in your location, so the water should be delivered quickly to sink in -- not by soaker hose. I use four Orbit 1/4 pattern Stream Bubbler heads per tree basin, mounted just inside the perimeter. They are programmed to come on twice per week for 8 minutes. The quantity of water delivered is intended to match our local evapotranspiration rate.

View attachment 23803
Click to expand...
Thanks for the detailed response. So how many gallons a week is that?
 
I was stressed getting out the door to the airport. I needed to do something in a hurry. Listening to what was said here. I put in a 6’ loop with 8 2gal/ hour drip emitters. The two already there were also 2gph, so I 5x’ed my water. I reset to 3x per week for 20 minutes, so I’m at 30 gallons per week. I also moved the rock out of the way and cut the landscape fabric and put the emitters below it and put the rock back. While it may get hot, hopefully there will be minimal evaporative loss. I’m watering at 5:30 in the morning. 2 gal/ hour is pretty much a stream not drips. Thanks for all the input. I’ll be back in 2 weeks, hopefully there will be some visible improvement.
 
My soil may not have such great drainage. My quick and dirty inspection showed pooling water. Which is what I want I gather.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top